Recently, India achieved a remarkable feat by successfully landing Chandrayaan 3 on the south pole of the moon. This moment filled the hearts of many common Indians with pride and a sense of accomplishment. However, a contrasting perspective emerged through an article titled “How to survive if you don’t feel proud of our Moon feat” written by Manu Joseph, a self-proclaimed journalist, published in The Mint’s modern times section.

The central theme of Joseph’s article questioned whether Indians should take pride in their moon landing achievement. He argued that India’s entry into the elite club of moon-landing nations had devalued it. Furthermore, he suggested that those who felt proud of this accomplishment lacked intellectual capacity and questioned whether, in the face of numerous national problems, such pride was even justified.

The underlying agenda of the article seemed to be undermining the nationalist movement in India. In doing so, it conflated patriotism with nationalism. This raises an essential question: are patriotism and nationalism the same thing?

A closer look at Joseph’s arguments reveals a bias towards nationalism. He suggested that only members of an exclusive elite club should aspire to land on the moon, implying that India’s achievement was somehow insignificant in comparison. In reality, India’s accomplishment paved the way for countries with ambitious space exploration goals but limited funding. This leads one to question the author’s intentions.

All nations face an array of persistent problems, making problem-solving a top priority. However, there are moments when citizens should reciprocate the same sense of pride that freedom fighters displayed during the war for independence. During this period, there were differing groups among the freedom fighters, but it does not diminish the collective feeling of patriotism.

The distinction between nationalism and patriotism depends on the perspective of the observer. Those who align themselves with left-leaning ideologies may see them as interchangeable. Many who felt genuine pride during India’s moon landing might not necessarily be nationalists, and it certainly doesn’t imply a lack of intellectual capacity. Assuming that every nationalist person has a low intellectual capacity is a sign of narrow-mindedness.

Patriotism and nationalism are distinct entities that should remain so. Viewing the world with a black-and-white lens oversimplifies its complexities. By recognizing the spectrum of perspectives, we gain a more profound understanding of these concepts.

In conclusion, the debate over patriotism and nationalism rages on. Especially in the context of significant national achievements like India’s moon landing. While some may blur the lines between the two, it’s vital to appreciate the nuances that distinguish them. Pride in one’s country and its achievements is a natural and commendable sentiment. And it does not necessarily equate to being a nationalist. It’s important to encourage open dialogue and diverse perspectives to enrich our understanding of these intricate concepts.

Related Post